Triple
T32058
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge |
E639
|
entity |
| Predicate | centralConcept |
P533
|
FINISHED |
| Object | consilience of inductions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: consilience of inductions | Statement: [Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, centralConcept, consilience of inductions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: centralConcept Context triple: [Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, centralConcept, consilience of inductions]
-
A.
hasConcept
Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
-
B.
coreIdea
chosen
Indicates the central concept or primary message that underlies or unifies something, such as a text, argument, or work.
-
C.
introducedConcept
Indicates that one entity is responsible for presenting, defining, or bringing a new concept into use or awareness for another entity or context.
-
D.
demonstratedConcept
Indicates that an entity has shown, illustrated, or made evident a particular concept through example, explanation, or action.
-
E.
category
Indicates that one entity is classified as a member or type within the grouping or class defined by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a249ec0d288190ac3a0939db61813b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24870417081909c7c01e400c94716 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.