Triple

T32057931
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cosham E818669 entity
Predicate positionRelativeToPortsmouth P197667 FINISHED
Object northern part of Portsmouth LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: northern part of Portsmouth | Statement: [Cosham, positionRelativeToPortsmouth, northern part of Portsmouth]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionRelativeToPortsmouth
Context triple: [Cosham, positionRelativeToPortsmouth, northern part of Portsmouth]
  • A. positionRelativeToCoast
    Indicates the spatial relationship of something to a coastline, such as its distance or orientation relative to the coast.
  • B. distanceToFolkestone
    Indicates the spatial distance between a given location or entity and the town of Folkestone.
  • C. locationRelativeToRichmond
    Indicates the spatial or geographic position of one place in relation to the reference location Richmond.
  • D. positionRelativeToTide
    Indicates the spatial relationship of something’s location with respect to the current or expected tide level or tidal zone.
  • E. positionRelativeToCanaryWharf
    Indicates the spatial or locational relationship of an entity with respect to Canary Wharf.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348fdacec8190b9f74375ca3b2094 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fea1f5d8c481908dc3351dc9ecef7f completed May 9, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fea06b6fe0819095bf4c1bc9809927 completed May 9, 2026, 2:48 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fea1f4daa88190bd3cc1ace684e77f completed May 9, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:21 a.m.