Triple
T32011
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Diversity of Life |
E638
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNotableConcept |
P531
|
FINISHED |
| Object | the sixth extinction |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: the sixth extinction | Statement: [The Diversity of Life, hasNotableConcept, the sixth extinction]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableConcept Context triple: [The Diversity of Life, hasNotableConcept, the sixth extinction]
-
A.
hasNotableSubject
Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
-
B.
hasConcept
chosen
Indicates that an entity includes, embodies, or is associated with a particular concept.
-
C.
hasNotableFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
-
D.
notableContribution
Indicates that an entity has made a significant, recognized contribution to another entity, field, work, or endeavor.
-
E.
notableFor
Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a249ec0d288190ac3a0939db61813b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24870417081909c7c01e400c94716 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.