Triple

T31975449
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject For King & Country E816438 entity
Predicate hasSiblingMemberRelationship P55387 FINISHED
Object Joel Smallbone NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Joel Smallbone | Statement: [For King & Country, hasSiblingMemberRelationship, Joel Smallbone]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSiblingMemberRelationship
Context triple: [For King & Country, hasSiblingMemberRelationship, Joel Smallbone]
  • A. hasSiblingMembers chosen
    Indicates that two entities are members of a group or organization and are siblings to each other within that membership context.
  • B. hasSisterRelationshipType
    Indicates that there exists a sister-type familial relationship between the related entities.
  • C. hasSuccessorMembers
    Indicates that one set of members follows or replaces another set of members in a sequence, order, or organizational structure.
  • D. hasMemberAlsoIn
    Indicates that an entity has at least one member who also belongs to another specified group or collection.
  • E. hasSiblingCollaboration
    Indicates a collaborative relationship between two entities that are considered siblings within the same hierarchy or family.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348f6a3008190bfb59ca695fd68e2 completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcf825ca7081909d06b0df33eb33f9 completed May 7, 2026, 8:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcf42160f0819096812a8bf590875e completed May 7, 2026, 8:20 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:11 a.m.