Triple

T31945252

Position	Surface form	Disambiguated ID	Type / Status
Subject	H 133	`E815632`	entity
Predicate	workSubject	`P7040`	FINISHED
Object	Aeneas in Carthage Aeneas in Carthage is a classical mythological episode depicting the Trojan hero’s sojourn and tragic love affair with Queen Dido during his fated journey to found Rome.	`E1985103`	NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini

Instruction

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Input

Phrase: Aeneas in Carthage | Statement: [H 133, workSubject, Aeneas in Carthage]

NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1

Instruction

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Input

Entity: Aeneas in Carthage
Triple: [H 133, workSubject, Aeneas in Carthage]

Generated description

Aeneas in Carthage is a classical mythological episode depicting the Trojan hero’s sojourn and tragic love affair with Queen Dido during his fated journey to found Rome.

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step	Stage	Batch ID	Status	When
creating	Elicitation	`batch_69f348f42d188190a33fc8d20ec50517`	completed	April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER	Named-entity recognition	`batch_69f6b27930d881909d5bef056bf5e7e5`	completed	May 3, 2026, 2:27 a.m.
NED1	Entity disambiguation (via context triple)	`batch_6a2e8a484aa48190a02fa1d469a1ed15`	completed	June 14, 2026, 11:02 a.m.
NEDg	Description generation	`batch_6a2e8b0d7b9881909941c614281a6c05`	completed	June 14, 2026, 11:05 a.m.
NED2	Entity disambiguation (via description)	`batch_6a2e8c005eb48190a28f4f07ad7c70af`	completed	June 14, 2026, 11:09 a.m.

Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:06 a.m.