Triple

T31916908
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lucius Scribonius Libo (consul 16 AD) E814856 entity
Predicate notable court case P207546 FINISHED
Object treason trial of 16–17 AD LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: treason trial of 16–17 AD | Statement: [Lucius Scribonius Libo (consul 16 AD), notable court case, treason trial of 16–17 AD]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notable court case
Context triple: [Lucius Scribonius Libo (consul 16 AD), notable court case, treason trial of 16–17 AD]
  • A. notableSupremeCourtCase
    Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
  • B. notableCourt
    Indicates that a particular court is especially significant or noteworthy in relation to the subject.
  • C. notableCaseContext
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular contextual detail, circumstance, or background information relevant to a notable case or instance.
  • D. courthouseNotability
    Indicates that an entity is notable or significant specifically in relation to a courthouse (e.g., its history, events, or functions).
  • E. notableCaseArea
    Indicates that a particular geographic area is notably associated with, or significantly involved in, a given case or legal matter.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348f109d88190b5005372c53d2fcd completed April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379eaa540819095a1c5d9f3513f9b completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c7ee0388190a29faeb5cdb0950a completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:02 a.m.