Triple
T31913277
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | In Memoriam James Joyce |
E814749
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPenNameOfAuthor |
P72674
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hugh MacDiarmid |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hugh MacDiarmid | Statement: [In Memoriam James Joyce, hasPenNameOfAuthor, Hugh MacDiarmid]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPenNameOfAuthor Context triple: [In Memoriam James Joyce, hasPenNameOfAuthor, Hugh MacDiarmid]
-
A.
pseudonymCoinedBy
Indicates that a particular pseudonym was created or invented by a specific agent or source.
-
B.
hasPenNameSubject
Indicates that the subject entity uses or is known by a particular pen name or pseudonym.
-
C.
pseudonymOfWriter
chosen
Indicates that one entity is a pseudonym used by a writer who is represented by the other entity.
-
D.
basedOnAuthorPseudonym
Indicates that something is derived from, inspired by, or determined using an author's pseudonym rather than their real name.
-
E.
pseudonymInspiredBy
Indicates that a pseudonym was chosen or created based on, or in homage to, another name, person, work, or concept.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348f109d88190b5005372c53d2fcd |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd3d46d1f48190a1b20dd063224b7d |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd3ae1510c81908fe1280efc17feee |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:22 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:01 a.m.