Triple

T31840947
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shatrah District E812800 entity
Predicate hasDeJureLanguage P45194 FINISHED
Object Arabic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arabic | Statement: [Shatrah District, hasDeJureLanguage, Arabic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDeJureLanguage
Context triple: [Shatrah District, hasDeJureLanguage, Arabic]
  • A. hasRepresentativeLanguage
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a language that serves as its primary or officially recognized means of representation or communication.
  • B. hasLanguageInCountry
    Indicates that a particular language is used or recognized within a specified country.
  • C. hasNotableLanguageWithOfficialStatusIn chosen
    Indicates that a language holds an officially recognized and notable status within a specified jurisdiction or region.
  • D. hasLanguageLegislation
    Indicates that there exists formal legislation or legal provisions governing the use, status, or regulation of language in relation to the subject entity.
  • E. hasLanguageStatus
    Indicates that an entity has a particular status or condition regarding its language use, recognition, or classification.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348ea7ffc8190a2ab43d80277cf59 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe6fea4a288190bf8615c5d6bf41b4 completed May 8, 2026, 11:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe6f774de08190975a2393b9a1fd22 completed May 8, 2026, 11:19 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:49 p.m.