Triple

T31826682
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Forensics Unit (Tampa Police Department) E812413 entity
Predicate evidenceRequirement P39303 FINISHED
Object maintain admissibility of evidence in court LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: maintain admissibility of evidence in court | Statement: [Forensics Unit (Tampa Police Department), evidenceRequirement, maintain admissibility of evidence in court]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evidenceRequirement
Context triple: [Forensics Unit (Tampa Police Department), evidenceRequirement, maintain admissibility of evidence in court]
  • A. evaluationRequirement
    Indicates that one entity imposes or specifies conditions under which another entity must be assessed, tested, or evaluated.
  • B. establishedRequirement chosen
    Indicates that one entity has formally set or defined a requirement that another entity is expected to satisfy or comply with.
  • C. requiredToProvide
    Indicates that one entity has an obligation or duty to supply or furnish something to another entity.
  • D. providesEvidenceFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as support, justification, or proof for the validity or truth of another entity.
  • E. requiredBy
    Indicates that one entity depends on or cannot function properly without another entity being present, completed, or satisfied.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e97fa48190aa06286962af6dee completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b49436b0819094e21603054d05d4 completed May 3, 2026, 2:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b3a7bdb481908d16a32f49e38c2c completed May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:46 p.m.