Triple
T31784993
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2010 United States Senate elections |
E811303
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableTeaPartyBackedWinner |
P207516
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rand Paul |
E45027
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rand Paul | Statement: [2010 United States Senate elections, notableTeaPartyBackedWinner, Rand Paul]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableTeaPartyBackedWinner Context triple: [2010 United States Senate elections, notableTeaPartyBackedWinner, Rand Paul]
-
A.
notableParty
Indicates that an entity is a significant or noteworthy participant in an event, activity, or relationship.
-
B.
winnerParty
Indicates the political party that has won a particular election, contest, or decision-making process.
-
C.
notablePartyRepresentation
Indicates that an entity is significantly or prominently represented or involved as a party in a particular event, case, or context.
-
D.
notablePresidentialCandidate
Indicates that a person has been a prominent or widely recognized candidate in a presidential election.
-
E.
notableNewPartyLeader
Indicates that an individual has recently become the leader of a political party in a way that is considered notable or significant.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e544a48190ab6e700b05f6438c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a2d9d5c91408190bc346b81942061b3 |
completed | June 13, 2026, 6:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379e7aa0c8190bdc9ee4d54fc821b |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c7ee0388190a29faeb5cdb0950a |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:37 p.m.