Triple
T31784008
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Justice Stephen Breyer’s concurrence in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action |
E811279
|
entity |
| Predicate | joinedJudgmentOf |
P43228
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court plurality upholding Michigan Proposal 2 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court plurality upholding Michigan Proposal 2 | Statement: [Justice Stephen Breyer’s concurrence in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, joinedJudgmentOf, Supreme Court plurality upholding Michigan Proposal 2]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: joinedJudgmentOf Context triple: [Justice Stephen Breyer’s concurrence in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, joinedJudgmentOf, Supreme Court plurality upholding Michigan Proposal 2]
-
A.
joinedByInJudgment
chosen
Indicates that one entity participates together with another entity in issuing or sharing a particular judgment or decision.
-
B.
leadingJudgmentBy
Indicates a relationship where one judgment or legal decision is treated as the primary or authoritative basis guiding or influencing another judgment.
-
C.
containsJudgmentIn
Indicates that one entity includes or embeds a specific judgment or decision within it.
-
D.
judgmentInvolves
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
E.
judgmentResult
Indicates the outcome or decision produced by a judgment, such as a court ruling, evaluation, or formal assessment, regarding the entities involved.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e544a48190ab6e700b05f6438c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b21e7e088190832a3db585daea1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b14faf608190a25b977c0740729c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:37 p.m.