Triple
T31761
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A Beautiful Mind (biography) |
E633
|
entity |
| Predicate | criticalReception |
P2378
|
FINISHED |
| Object | widely acclaimed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: widely acclaimed | Statement: [A Beautiful Mind (biography), criticalReception, widely acclaimed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticalReception Context triple: [A Beautiful Mind (biography), criticalReception, widely acclaimed]
-
A.
criticizedFor
Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
-
B.
restriction
Indicates a limiting condition or rule that constrains or controls what an entity can do, use, or access in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
rejectedBy
Indicates that one entity has been refused, dismissed, or not accepted by another entity.
-
D.
hasReception
Indicates that an entity hosts, includes, or is associated with a reception event (such as a formal gathering or welcoming function).
-
E.
peerReview
Indicates that one entity evaluates, critiques, or validates the work or performance of another entity, typically as an equal in expertise or status.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a249ec0d288190ac3a0939db61813b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24870417081909c7c01e400c94716 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a249eb52a08190916849b44bd9d68d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.