Triple

T31735839
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Chief Justice John Roberts’s concurrence in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action E809990 entity
Predicate votesWith P172484 FINISHED
Object majority LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: majority | Statement: [Chief Justice John Roberts’s concurrence in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, votesWith, majority]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: votesWith
Context triple: [Chief Justice John Roberts’s concurrence in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, votesWith, majority]
  • A. votesOnly
    Indicates that an entity participates in a decision-making process solely by casting votes, without engaging in any other associated actions or roles.
  • B. voteOn
    Indicates that an entity formally expresses a choice or decision regarding a specific proposal, issue, or candidate.
  • C. voteCount
    Indicates the number of votes that have been cast for or associated with a particular item or option.
  • D. yesVotes
    Indicates that a specified entity has cast or received affirmative votes in a decision-making or voting context.
  • E. voteFor
    Indicates that one entity casts or expresses a vote in favor of another entity or option.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348e0e4908190a884582eca646fb7 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6abe15d5c81909ccf4ce37f78bc43 completed May 3, 2026, 1:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aa20a1588190a53533fc9764efb2 completed May 3, 2026, 1:51 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6aaf31a548190b2f792ff4b8c002a completed May 3, 2026, 1:54 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:23 p.m.