Triple
T31735528
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Utah v. Strieff |
E809983
|
entity |
| Predicate | separateDissentOpinionBy |
P4522
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Justice Elena Kagan |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Justice Elena Kagan | Statement: [Utah v. Strieff, separateDissentOpinionBy, Justice Elena Kagan]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: separateDissentOpinionBy Context triple: [Utah v. Strieff, separateDissentOpinionBy, Justice Elena Kagan]
-
A.
dissentingJustice
chosen
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
B.
separateOpinionType
Indicates that one party holds a distinct or differing type of opinion from another party or from a main/standard opinion.
-
C.
hasDissentingOpinions
Indicates that one or more entities hold opinions that disagree with or oppose a prevailing, majority, or authoritative view in a given context.
-
D.
hasSeparateOpinions
Indicates that the related entities hold distinct or differing views, judgments, or beliefs about a subject.
-
E.
hasDissentingJustice
Indicates that within a judicial decision or ruling, there exists at least one justice who formally disagrees with the majority opinion.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348e0e4908190a884582eca646fb7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b21e7e088190832a3db585daea1c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b14faf608190a25b977c0740729c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 11:23 p.m.