Triple

T31668
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nash embedding theorem E631 entity
Predicate isStrongerThan P2373 FINISHED
Object local isometric embedding theorems LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local isometric embedding theorems | Statement: [Nash embedding theorem, isStrongerThan, local isometric embedding theorems]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isStrongerThan
Context triple: [Nash embedding theorem, isStrongerThan, local isometric embedding theorems]
  • A. isComparedTo
    Indicates that one entity is evaluated or measured in relation to another to highlight similarities, differences, or relative qualities.
  • B. hasPower
    Indicates that one entity possesses authority, control, or influence over another entity or over a particular domain or resource.
  • C. combatantStrength
    Indicates the relative level of power, capability, or effectiveness one combatant has in a conflict or confrontation compared to others.
  • D. collectionStrength
    Indicates the degree or intensity of association or cohesion among items within a collection.
  • E. competesWith
    Indicates that two entities are in rivalry or opposition, each striving to outperform or gain advantage over the other in the same domain or objective.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a249ec0d288190ac3a0939db61813b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a24870417081909c7c01e400c94716 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a249eb52a08190916849b44bd9d68d completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.