Triple

T31653922
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gillard Government E807807 entity
Predicate policyAreaFocus P1876 FINISHED
Object education reform LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: education reform | Statement: [Gillard Government, policyAreaFocus, education reform]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: policyAreaFocus
Context triple: [Gillard Government, policyAreaFocus, education reform]
  • A. policyFocus chosen
    Indicates that an entity (such as a person, organization, or document) is primarily concerned with, directed toward, or centered on a particular policy area or issue.
  • B. policyAreaScope
    Indicates the specific policy domain or thematic area to which an action, decision, or measure is relevant or applies.
  • C. commonPolicyArea
    Indicates that two entities share the same policy domain, topic, or area of regulatory or legislative focus.
  • D. emphasizesPolicyArea
    Indicates that one entity gives particular importance or priority to a specific policy area in its actions, statements, or focus.
  • E. policyTopic
    Indicates that one entity is about, concerned with, or categorized under a particular policy-related subject or theme.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348daf95c81908b4c985b7ddcd0b3 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f727afd5d88190ad48735cd1b32787 completed May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f72737c42c8190a3f781a5e98868ff completed May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:54 p.m.