Triple
T31652302
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sir Gaven Donne |
E807762
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
judiciary of Niue
The judiciary of Niue is the island nation's independent court system responsible for interpreting and applying its laws, including through a High Court and appellate arrangements linked to New Zealand’s judicial structure.
|
E1972137
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judiciary of Niue | Statement: [Sir Gaven Donne, partOf, judiciary of Niue]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: judiciary of Niue Triple: [Sir Gaven Donne, partOf, judiciary of Niue]
Generated description
The judiciary of Niue is the island nation's independent court system responsible for interpreting and applying its laws, including through a High Court and appellate arrangements linked to New Zealand’s judicial structure.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348daf95c81908b4c985b7ddcd0b3 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a95a6d5881908bdb9f589a36cc91 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:48 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a2b79e550e481909aa06a7ccf4705bd |
completed | June 12, 2026, 3:15 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a2b7a866a408190a377ebe1dfb4b162 |
completed | June 12, 2026, 3:18 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a2b7b5699c48190b83c080aa685a7b4 |
completed | June 12, 2026, 3:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:53 p.m.