Triple
T31594833
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wolane language |
E806192
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConsonantEmphasis |
P203944
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ejective consonants |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ejective consonants | Statement: [Wolane language, hasConsonantEmphasis, ejective consonants]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConsonantEmphasis Context triple: [Wolane language, hasConsonantEmphasis, ejective consonants]
-
A.
emphasizesConsonanceOf
Indicates that one entity highlights, stresses, or draws attention to the harmony, agreement, or consonant relationship between itself and another entity.
-
B.
hasConsonantHarmony
Indicates that the entities are related by a pattern where consonants within a linguistic unit adjust to share similar features, creating consonant harmony.
-
C.
hasConsonantGradation
Indicates that a word undergoes systematic alternation of its consonants (consonant gradation) in different morphological or phonological forms.
-
D.
hasConsonantPhonemes
Indicates that an entity possesses or includes one or more consonant phonemes in its phonological system.
-
E.
hasEmphasis
Indicates that one element is given special stress, importance, or prominence relative to others.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d4891c8190b02bae3c8ecb68b7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a02fc3890a881908b69b0f2d7cc1ce1 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a02fb98438c8190938896c00216b9ec |
completed | May 12, 2026, 10:06 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a02fc379d1c8190aeb144f093169cfa |
completed | May 12, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:30 p.m.