Triple
T31592
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Non-cooperative Games |
E630
|
entity |
| Predicate | contribution |
P477
|
FINISHED |
| Object | founded modern non-cooperative game theory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: founded modern non-cooperative game theory | Statement: [Non-cooperative Games, contribution, founded modern non-cooperative game theory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contribution Context triple: [Non-cooperative Games, contribution, founded modern non-cooperative game theory]
-
A.
notableContribution
chosen
Indicates that an entity has made a significant, recognized contribution to another entity, field, work, or endeavor.
-
B.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
C.
donated
Indicates that one entity voluntarily gave something of value (such as money, goods, or time) to another entity, typically without expecting anything in return.
-
D.
support
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity or its actions.
-
E.
submittedTo
Indicates that one entity has formally sent or presented something (such as a document, request, or work) to another entity for consideration, review, or processing.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a249ec0d288190ac3a0939db61813b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a24870417081909c7c01e400c94716 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.