Triple

T3158753
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nuevo sol E66052 entity
Predicate legalStatusAfterRenaming P46699 FINISHED
Object same currency continued under name sol LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: same currency continued under name sol | Statement: [Nuevo sol, legalStatusAfterRenaming, same currency continued under name sol]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusAfterRenaming
Context triple: [Nuevo sol, legalStatusAfterRenaming, same currency continued under name sol]
  • A. legalStatusClarifiedBy
    Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
  • B. legalStatusAfter2005
    Indicates the legal status or condition that applies to an entity starting from the year 2005 onward.
  • C. legalStatusAfter2009
    Indicates the legal status or condition that an entity holds from the year 2009 onward, typically reflecting changes due to laws or regulations taking effect at or after that time.
  • D. nameStatus
    Indicates the status or condition associated with an entity’s name, such as whether it is current, preferred, alternate, or deprecated.
  • E. legalStatusAfter1983
    Indicates the legal status or classification that an entity holds starting from the year 1983 onward.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85850c1481908a9e9c6242238de2 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada5ed82a08190a1bdcf18ee593c79 completed March 8, 2026, 4:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9dfbf0348190952a6bca8fc5fed1 completed March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ada1e4f7288190a80a1672e458132d completed March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:05 p.m.