Triple
T31582062
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Penuel |
E805851
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLaterBiblicalReference |
P3890
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Book of Judges |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Book of Judges | Statement: [Penuel, hasLaterBiblicalReference, Book of Judges]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLaterBiblicalReference Context triple: [Penuel, hasLaterBiblicalReference, Book of Judges]
-
A.
hasBiblicalConnection
chosen
Indicates a relationship in which one entity is connected to another through references, themes, origins, or influences derived from the Bible.
-
B.
hasPrimaryBiblicalText
Indicates that one entity is associated with another entity that serves as its main or authoritative biblical text.
-
C.
isBiblicalVariantOf
Indicates that one textual form or reading is a variant version of another within the biblical textual tradition.
-
D.
hasScripture
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is defined by a particular scripture or set of scriptural texts.
-
E.
hasViewOnScripture
Indicates that an entity holds a particular interpretive stance or doctrinal position regarding scripture.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d3a86c8190a3e5e539a4dd125f |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe38be079c8190a240191ac0e73e3a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe350344508190930de2218156ca02 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:24 p.m.