Triple

T31561387
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nujiang Grand Canyon E805272 entity
Predicate primaryEthnicGroupsNearby P65193 FINISHED
Object Lisu people E730377 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lisu people | Statement: [Nujiang Grand Canyon, primaryEthnicGroupsNearby, Lisu people]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryEthnicGroupsNearby
Context triple: [Nujiang Grand Canyon, primaryEthnicGroupsNearby, Lisu people]
  • A. nearEthnicGroup
    Indicates that one entity is located geographically close to an ethnic group.
  • B. ethnicGroupLocatedIn
    Indicates that a particular ethnic group is present, resides, or is primarily associated with a specific geographic location or region.
  • C. dominantEthnicGroups chosen
    Indicates that the specified ethnic groups hold primary demographic, cultural, or political prominence within a given region or population.
  • D. sharesEthnicity
    Indicates that two entities belong to the same ethnic group or share the same ethnic background.
  • E. relatedEthnicGroup
    Indicates that there is a notable ethnic connection or association between two ethnic groups, such as shared ancestry, culture, or historical ties.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348d22e088190ad555d5bd42f9da0 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c876524819098545e6037d3107d completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a3729b8e0b08190a930e4d355b143f8 completed June 21, 2026, midnight
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379e7aa0c8190bdc9ee4d54fc821b completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:15 p.m.