Triple
T31546052
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ICTR Statute |
E804875
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | international tribunal statute |
C26820
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: international tribunal statute Context triple: [ICTR Statute, instanceOf, international tribunal statute]
-
A.
international criminal tribunal statute
chosen
An international criminal tribunal statute is a foundational legal instrument that establishes the jurisdiction, structure, procedures, and substantive crimes for a tribunal tasked with prosecuting individuals for serious violations of international law.
-
B.
internationalized criminal tribunal
An internationalized criminal tribunal is a hybrid court that combines domestic and international law, personnel, and procedures to prosecute individuals for serious crimes such as war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide within a specific country or conflict.
-
C.
international criminal law instrument
An international criminal law instrument is a formal legal document—such as a treaty, statute, or convention—that establishes, defines, or regulates criminal responsibility and procedures at the international level.
-
D.
International Criminal Court document
An International Criminal Court document is an official legal record or instrument produced, filed, or issued in connection with investigations, prosecutions, or proceedings under the jurisdiction of the ICC.
-
E.
private international law instrument
A private international law instrument is a legal tool—such as a treaty, regulation, or convention—that coordinates which jurisdiction’s laws and courts apply to cross-border private disputes and how foreign judgments are recognized and enforced.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348d11a048190a65eb8384a3754ac |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 10:08 p.m.