Triple

T31456766
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject neo-Friesian school E802470 entity
Predicate hasDoctrinalCore P30156 FINISHED
Object renewal of Friesian critique within neo-Kantian framework LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: renewal of Friesian critique within neo-Kantian framework | Statement: [neo-Friesian school, hasDoctrinalCore, renewal of Friesian critique within neo-Kantian framework]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDoctrinalCore
Context triple: [neo-Friesian school, hasDoctrinalCore, renewal of Friesian critique within neo-Kantian framework]
  • A. hasDoctrinalCharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific doctrinal feature, quality, or attribute within a belief or teaching system.
  • B. hasDoctrinalTest
    Indicates that an entity is subject to, or associated with, a specific doctrinal test or examination of beliefs.
  • C. hasDoctrinalBasis chosen
    Indicates that one concept, claim, or practice is grounded in, supported by, or derived from a specific doctrine or set of doctrines.
  • D. hasDoctrinalStandardInPart
    Indicates that one entity possesses or upholds a specific doctrinal standard within a particular section or component of itself.
  • E. hasNumberOfDoctrines
    Indicates the relationship that specifies how many doctrines are associated with a given entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f348c678ac81908a2e950867619061 completed April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f70e8755a48190931eaa77946f9460 completed May 3, 2026, 8:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f70abc00848190a1c3f495ef6c8dc6 completed May 3, 2026, 8:43 a.m.
Created at: April 30, 2026, 9:16 p.m.