Triple
T31430843
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Matrix Resurrections |
E801792
|
entity |
| Predicate | reusesMusicalMotif |
P37245
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Neo theme |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Neo theme | Statement: [The Matrix Resurrections, reusesMusicalMotif, Neo theme]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reusesMusicalMotif Context triple: [The Matrix Resurrections, reusesMusicalMotif, Neo theme]
-
A.
melodyReusedBy
chosen
Indicates that a melody originally used in one work is later reused or incorporated in another work.
-
B.
repeatedMotive
Indicates that the same motive recurs multiple times within a work, sequence, or context.
-
C.
usesRepetition
Indicates that one entity employs repeated elements, actions, or patterns as a deliberate feature or technique in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
isOftenSungToTune
Indicates that one song or piece of text is frequently performed using the melody or musical setting of another.
-
E.
repeatsInSong
Indicates that a musical element (such as a lyric, phrase, or motif) occurs multiple times within the same song.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f348c475348190bf579ca858eec77c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6a916d2e08190bafc01cba73b6469 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6a7548eb48190a69b60a3c6ad53b9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m. |
Created at: April 30, 2026, 8:57 p.m.