Triple
T314219
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Swedish-speaking Finns |
E7671
|
entity |
| Predicate | selfDesignationInFinnish |
P1435
|
FINISHED |
| Object | suomenruotsalaiset |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: suomenruotsalaiset | Statement: [Swedish-speaking Finns, selfDesignationInFinnish, suomenruotsalaiset]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: selfDesignationInFinnish Context triple: [Swedish-speaking Finns, selfDesignationInFinnish, suomenruotsalaiset]
-
A.
selfIdentification
Indicates that an entity defines or declares its own identity, attributes, or classification about itself.
-
B.
hasDesignation
Indicates that an entity holds or is assigned a specific title, label, or formal designation.
-
C.
hasEndonym
chosen
Indicates that an entity has a name or designation used by native speakers or within its own local language or community.
-
D.
nativeLabel
Indicates the label or name of an entity expressed in its own native or original language.
-
E.
hasDemonym
Indicates that one entity is the term (demonym) used to refer to the inhabitants or natives of another entity (typically a place).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7e7af7881908890039d6be4e9b8 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea62f830819089e94b3aa3e4e187 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9428098819089d5950cd2c96dc4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 p.m.