Triple

T31381279
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yimkhiung Naga tribe E800461 entity
Predicate traditionalAdornment P23430 FINISHED
Object bead necklaces LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bead necklaces | Statement: [Yimkhiung Naga tribe, traditionalAdornment, bead necklaces]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalAdornment
Context triple: [Yimkhiung Naga tribe, traditionalAdornment, bead necklaces]
  • A. adornedWith chosen
    Indicates that one entity is decorated, embellished, or ornamented by another entity.
  • B. traditionalStyle
    Indicates that something follows or embodies a conventional, long-established way of doing, making, or presenting it, in contrast to modern or innovative styles.
  • C. traditionalEnd
    Indicates that one entity is the customary or historically established conclusion, outcome, or final stage of another entity or process.
  • D. traditionalMotif
    Indicates that something incorporates, represents, or is characterized by a motif rooted in established cultural or historical traditions.
  • E. usesTraditionalDecoration
    Indicates that an entity employs customary or historically established decorative styles or motifs in its design or presentation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224e84da08190abfc2f17494a33c8 completed April 29, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe5c1a502081909d4024e514309c8e completed May 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe5a9df21c819087153f5d0bcaa987 completed May 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:18 p.m.