Triple
T31372841
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dogfight |
E800211
|
entity |
| Predicate | composerLyricistDuo |
P12698
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pasek and Paul |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pasek and Paul | Statement: [Dogfight, composerLyricistDuo, Pasek and Paul]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: composerLyricistDuo Context triple: [Dogfight, composerLyricistDuo, Pasek and Paul]
-
A.
hasComposerLyricistTeam
chosen
Indicates a relationship where a musical work is associated with a specific team that jointly fulfills the roles of composer and lyricist.
-
B.
writerOfMusicAndLyrics
Indicates that a person is the creator of both the musical composition and the song lyrics for a work.
-
C.
artistDuoMember
Indicates that one entity is a member of a specific artist duo.
-
D.
fromArtistDuo
Indicates that something originates from or is created by a pair of artists working together as a duo.
-
E.
lyricallyPairedWith
Indicates that two musical or poetic elements are intentionally matched or combined in lyrics, such as being written to accompany each other or to form a complementary lyrical pair.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e84da08190abfc2f17494a33c8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:34 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbc9d1dba881908c399b8e1dc13ce2 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbc8ec03ac8190a757563f96fab283 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:18 p.m.