Triple

T3133466
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Morrison R. Waite E65471 entity
Predicate presidedOver P1766 FINISHED
Object United States v. Cruikshank E150291 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Cruikshank | Statement: [Morrison R. Waite, presidedOver, United States v. Cruikshank]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Cruikshank
Context triple: [Morrison R. Waite, presidedOver, United States v. Cruikshank]
  • A. United States v. Cruikshank chosen
    United States v. Cruikshank was an 1876 U.S. Supreme Court decision that severely limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections, especially against racially motivated violence in the Reconstruction-era South.
  • B. Ableman v. Booth
    Ableman v. Booth was an 1859 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over state courts in enforcing the Fugitive Slave Act before the Civil War.
  • C. Slaughter-House Cases
    The Slaughter-House Cases were an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause, significantly limiting its protection of civil rights against state infringement.
  • D. Kentucky v. Dennison
    Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
  • E. Ex parte Merryman
    Ex parte Merryman was an 1861 U.S. federal court case in which Chief Justice Roger B. Taney challenged President Abraham Lincoln’s authority to suspend the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8581c25c8190b0d85ba9b9baa531 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada56104ec8190a14591ed73f3fe83 completed March 8, 2026, 4:35 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b20f84d8288190b1f48fa0f5c10773 completed March 12, 2026, 12:57 a.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:04 p.m.