Triple
T31317548
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Willow (90s Trend Remix) |
E798635
|
entity |
| Predicate | originalSongAppearsOn |
P31094
|
FINISHED |
| Object | evermore |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: evermore | Statement: [Willow (90s Trend Remix), originalSongAppearsOn, evermore]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalSongAppearsOn Context triple: [Willow (90s Trend Remix), originalSongAppearsOn, evermore]
-
A.
originalSongAlbum
Indicates that an album is the original release on which a given song first appeared.
-
B.
appearsInSongBy
Indicates that an entity is mentioned, referenced, or featured within a song created or performed by a specified artist or musical act.
-
C.
isSongOnAlbumOfArtist
Indicates that a given song appears on an album that is created or performed by a specified artist.
-
D.
coveredSongBy
Indicates that one musical work is a cover version performed or recorded by an artist of a song originally created or popularized by another artist.
-
E.
originalSong
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the source or initial version of a song from which another entity (such as a cover, remix, or adaptation) is derived.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224e1932c81908fef14f7b03a10b7 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00b03a50a88190bfb95cdcfc6142a2 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00afe55f248190b2cb4c7e62cc3ffc |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:15 p.m.