Triple

T31314681
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject You Belong With Me (Taylor’s Version) E798558 entity
Predicate hasUpdatedRecording P172215 FINISHED
Object vocals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: vocals | Statement: [You Belong With Me (Taylor’s Version), hasUpdatedRecording, vocals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUpdatedRecording
Context triple: [You Belong With Me (Taylor’s Version), hasUpdatedRecording, vocals]
  • A. hasRe-recording
    Indicates that one recording is a new or updated version made again from the same original material or performance.
  • B. hasRecordingWith
    Indicates that one entity is associated with or includes a particular recording as part of its content or representation.
  • C. hasRecordingLegacy
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a historical or prior version of a recording, capturing its legacy or earlier state.
  • D. isUpdated
    Indicates that an entity has been modified or brought to a more recent state compared to its previous version or a reference point.
  • E. isReRecording
    Indicates that an existing recording is being recorded again, typically to replace, update, or improve the original version.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224e1932c81908fef14f7b03a10b7 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a9603b208190b3533ea2b441514c completed May 3, 2026, 1:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6a7548eb48190a69b60a3c6ad53b9 completed May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6a915ead881909463ae46419c343e completed May 3, 2026, 1:47 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:15 p.m.