Triple
T31129754
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Team B |
E793466
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTeamRole |
P69097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | serves as a level below Team A |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: serves as a level below Team A | Statement: [Team B, relatedTeamRole, serves as a level below Team A]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedTeamRole Context triple: [Team B, relatedTeamRole, serves as a level below Team A]
-
A.
relatedTeam
chosen
Indicates that two teams are connected or associated with each other in a relevant or meaningful way.
-
B.
associatedTeam
Indicates that one entity is linked or connected to a particular team, typically as its member, owner, or primary affiliation.
-
C.
associatedTeamPrincipal
Indicates that there is a relationship in which a specific team principal is linked or connected to a particular team.
-
D.
associatedWithTeamMember
Indicates a relationship where an entity has a connection, involvement, or linkage with a specific member of a team.
-
E.
rosterRelationship
Indicates a relationship where one entity is listed as a member, participant, or component within another entity’s roster or lineup.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224d1701c819094f429798290e361 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c876524819098545e6037d3107d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379e5174c8190a0bdde7e381b7624 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:05 p.m.