Triple
T31067766
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Douglas Hickox |
E791724
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Sitting Target
Sitting Target is a 1972 British crime thriller film starring Oliver Reed as a vengeful convict, directed by Douglas Hickox.
|
E1943937
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sitting Target | Statement: [Douglas Hickox, notableWork, Sitting Target]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Sitting Target Triple: [Douglas Hickox, notableWork, Sitting Target]
Generated description
Sitting Target is a 1972 British crime thriller film starring Oliver Reed as a vengeful convict, directed by Douglas Hickox.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cc0c5c81908404f087bff92997 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6957d170c8190bfd0bed26b8d1d30 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a292b1c1e24819081d4190644d23876 |
completed | June 10, 2026, 9:15 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a292bba50988190872ce52d274d9ddf |
completed | June 10, 2026, 9:17 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a292c75ef8481908b7b700acfc11de5 |
completed | June 10, 2026, 9:20 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9:01 p.m.