Triple
T31056296
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ASBO |
E791406
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusInEnglandAndWales |
P36191
|
FINISHED |
| Object | abolished |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: abolished | Statement: [ASBO, legalStatusInEnglandAndWales, abolished]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusInEnglandAndWales Context triple: [ASBO, legalStatusInEnglandAndWales, abolished]
-
A.
legalStatusUnderBritish
Indicates the legal status or classification an entity holds under British law or the British legal system.
-
B.
statusInEnglishLaw
chosen
Indicates the legal standing, classification, or condition of something as defined within the framework of English law.
-
C.
legalStatusAccordingToIndia
Indicates the legal status or classification of an entity as defined specifically by the laws and regulations of India.
-
D.
statusInScotsLaw
Indicates that one entity holds a particular legal status, classification, or standing under the rules and doctrines of Scots law in relation to the other entity.
-
E.
statusInUK
Indicates the legal or official status that an entity holds within the United Kingdom (e.g., immigration, residency, or authorization category).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224cb08908190ba71ad9aa87518ed |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe779248c081909f0ed1a2a0df23db |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe76eaf6d48190998bc7168749cc42 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 9 p.m.