Triple

T310068
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States E6385 entity
Predicate currentAssociateJusticesCount P4894 FINISHED
Object 8 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 8 | Statement: [Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, currentAssociateJusticesCount, 8]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: currentAssociateJusticesCount
Context triple: [Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, currentAssociateJusticesCount, 8]
  • A. numberOfAssociateJustices chosen
    Indicates the total count of associate justices associated with a given judicial body or court.
  • B. definedNumberOfAssociateJustices
    Indicates that an entity specifies or establishes the exact number of associate justices in a particular judicial body or court.
  • C. chiefJusticeSinceYear
    Indicates that an entity has held the position of chief justice starting from a specified year.
  • D. chiefJustice
    Indicates that one entity serves as the chief justice (the highest-ranking judicial officer) of another entity, such as a court or jurisdiction.
  • E. hasConcurringJustice
    Indicates that a judicial decision is associated with a justice who wrote or joined a concurring opinion.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e79230508190b912ecb555aae17e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea4778cc8190be7b648a82542891 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e940b9e8819092b821ff17ed026b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.