Triple

T3097780
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Andrew Murray Burnham E64640 entity
Predicate stoodForElection P7871 FINISHED
Object 2010 Labour Party leadership election LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2010 Labour Party leadership election | Statement: [Andrew Murray Burnham, stoodForElection, 2010 Labour Party leadership election]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stoodForElection
Context triple: [Andrew Murray Burnham, stoodForElection, 2010 Labour Party leadership election]
  • A. electionParticipatedIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity took part as a candidate, voter, organizer, or in another official capacity in a specific election.
  • B. nominatedForOffice
    Indicates that an entity has been formally put forward as a candidate to hold a particular office or position.
  • C. usedInElection
    Indicates that something (such as a resource, tool, or method) was employed or applied as part of conducting an election.
  • D. partyInElection
    Indicates that a political party participates as a contestant or actor in a specific election.
  • E. couldElect
    Indicates that one entity has the potential or ability, under certain conditions or rules, to choose another entity for an office, role, or position through an election.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad857dc98481909e585dc3372e3ed5 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada23dde988190a1aca020685594f3 completed March 8, 2026, 4:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9df06ed88190809f0683122caa5a completed March 8, 2026, 4:04 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.