Triple

T30966581
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ceremonial county of Dyfed E788973 entity
Predicate hasHistoricCountyPrecursor P195973 FINISHED
Object Dyfed NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dyfed | Statement: [ceremonial county of Dyfed, hasHistoricCountyPrecursor, Dyfed]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricCountyPrecursor
Context triple: [ceremonial county of Dyfed, hasHistoricCountyPrecursor, Dyfed]
  • A. historicCountyPredecessor
    Indicates that one historic county served as a predecessor or earlier form of another historic county in an administrative or territorial succession.
  • B. hasAssociatedHistoricCounty
    Indicates that an entity is linked to a specific historic county with which it is geographically or administratively associated.
  • C. hasHistoricCountyStatusSince
    Indicates that an entity has held the legal or recognized status of a historic county starting from a specified point in time.
  • D. hasHistoricCountyCore
    Indicates that an entity is fundamentally based in, derived from, or primarily associated with a particular historic county as its core area.
  • E. hasHistoricCountyCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific historic county, identified by its county code.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224c3a6b48190951add9b7b7f0271 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdfbafe32081909c62653ff4fc155c completed May 8, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdf64db4a881908f8250e24ae3cefb completed May 8, 2026, 2:42 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fdfbae00e481908a2e4558b9dee07e completed May 8, 2026, 3:05 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:54 p.m.