Triple
T30949529
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fujifilm X-S20 |
E788495
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsFLog2 |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Fujifilm X-S20, supportsFLog2, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsFLog2 Context triple: [Fujifilm X-S20, supportsFLog2, true]
-
A.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
B.
usesLogarithmBase
Indicates that one quantity or expression is defined, computed, or interpreted using a logarithm with a specified base.
-
C.
supportsAt
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity in a specific context, location, or point in time.
-
D.
hasLogarithmicRelation
Indicates that one quantity varies as the logarithm of another, expressing a relationship where changes in one are proportional to the logarithm of changes in the other.
-
E.
isSupportedBy
Indicates that an entity is upheld, sustained, or enabled by another entity, which provides necessary assistance, resources, or justification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224c180f88190ad177372ee02b7e2 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c876524819098545e6037d3107d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379e2fac0819089b522db3260028c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:53 p.m.