Triple
T3094364
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Principles and Parameters Theory |
E64556
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusInField |
P127
|
FINISHED |
| Object | foundational framework in late 20th-century generative syntax |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: foundational framework in late 20th-century generative syntax | Statement: [Principles and Parameters Theory, statusInField, foundational framework in late 20th-century generative syntax]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInField Context triple: [Principles and Parameters Theory, statusInField, foundational framework in late 20th-century generative syntax]
-
A.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
-
B.
statusInLogic
Indicates the logical status or role an entity holds within a formal reasoning or inference context.
-
C.
status
chosen
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
-
D.
statusFormula
Indicates a formal expression or rule that defines or evaluates the current status or condition of something.
-
E.
statusChange
Indicates a transition in an entity’s state or condition from one status to another over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857c97d88190b26f9b1c90839c77 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada239a8c88190a746892b56ee7e02 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9ded78f881908be6fc0fb7c35764 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:03 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.