Triple

T30907863
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lupita Ramos E787352 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWithJohn W. Creasy P207318 FINISHED
Object forms deep emotional bond — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: forms deep emotional bond | Statement: [Lupita Ramos, relationshipTypeWithJohn W. Creasy, forms deep emotional bond]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithJohn W. Creasy
Context triple: [Lupita Ramos, relationshipTypeWithJohn W. Creasy, forms deep emotional bond]
  • A. relationshipTypeWithJohnLuther
    Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship an entity has with John Luther.
  • B. relationshipTypeWith Alicia Johns
    Indicates the specific type or nature of the relationship that an entity has with Alicia Johns.
  • C. relationshipTypeWithJohnMurdoch
    Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship that an entity has with John Murdoch.
  • D. relationshipToJohnAndrewLast
    Indicates a familial or social relationship that an entity has specifically to John Andrew Last.
  • E. relationshipTypeWithJohnHartigan
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with John Hartigan.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224be300c8190a6513ce1ee0a7026 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379e2fac0819089b522db3260028c completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c7ee0388190a29faeb5cdb0950a completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:50 p.m.