Triple

T3086524
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Superstition E64384 entity
Predicate hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic P45796 FINISHED
Object syncopated groove LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: syncopated groove | Statement: [Superstition, hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic, syncopated groove]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic
Context triple: [Superstition, hasMusicalStyleCharacteristic, syncopated groove]
  • A. hasSongStyle
    Indicates that an entity possesses, is characterized by, or is associated with a particular style or genre of song.
  • B. includesMusicalStyle
    Indicates that one entity encompasses, features, or incorporates a particular musical style as part of its content or character.
  • C. hasMusical
    Indicates that one entity features, includes, or is associated with a musical work, performance, or musical component.
  • D. styleOfMusic
    Indicates the musical genre or stylistic category that characterizes a piece of music, artist, or performance.
  • E. hasMusicalForm
    Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or piece) is characterized by or structured according to a particular musical form.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad857bb4c88190a4cf27893fcabed8 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada1ec187c819084565514ebb99cdb completed March 8, 2026, 4:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9ded78f881908be6fc0fb7c35764 completed March 8, 2026, 4:03 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ada0f6fef48190b13898be383a246b completed March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.