Triple
T30856932
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Russell Dunbar |
E785948
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTypeWith Adam Rhodes |
P204303
|
FINISHED |
| Object | friendship |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: friendship | Statement: [Russell Dunbar, relationshipTypeWith Adam Rhodes, friendship]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWith Adam Rhodes Context triple: [Russell Dunbar, relationshipTypeWith Adam Rhodes, friendship]
-
A.
relationshipTypeWithAdamBonner
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Adam Bonner.
-
B.
hasRelationshipTypeWith Vince Tyler
Indicates that an entity is connected to Vince Tyler by a specific, characterized type of relationship.
-
C.
relationshipTypeWithJonArbuckle
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Jon Arbuckle.
-
D.
hasFictionalRelationshipWith
Indicates that there exists a fictional or imagined relationship between two entities, such as characters in a story or hypothetical scenarios.
-
E.
relationshipTypeWithSamMalone
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Sam Malone.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b91c14819084e764832fe67a57 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0379a4086c8190a83df5570f737e15 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037049db848190a6268bf1a8a60223 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 6:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a0379a33dc48190a29f72268c8ca8a8 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:46 p.m.