Triple

T3085343
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Guaymí E64357 entity
Predicate historicalLanguageName P7165 FINISHED
Object Guaymí language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Guaymí language | Statement: [Guaymí, historicalLanguageName, Guaymí language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalLanguageName
Context triple: [Guaymí, historicalLanguageName, Guaymí language]
  • A. historicalLanguage chosen
    Indicates that one language is a historical or earlier form/ancestor of another language.
  • B. languageOfHistoricalRecord
    Indicates the language in which a given historical record is written or recorded.
  • C. historicalLanguageStatus
    Indicates that a language had a particular official, social, or functional status during a past historical period.
  • D. historicalLanguageGroup
    Indicates that two or more entities belong to the same historically defined language group or family, based on shared linguistic ancestry or development.
  • E. historicalLanguageRegion
    Indicates that a language was historically spoken or used within a particular geographic region, regardless of its current status there.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad857bb4c88190a4cf27893fcabed8 completed March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ada1eac5548190bee60ea8262c65a8 completed March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9debb6308190be28378ae1fc98af completed March 8, 2026, 4:03 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.