Triple
T3081734
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 1122 |
E64273
|
entity |
| Predicate | obsoletes |
P101
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RFC 0950 |
E60448
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 0950 | Statement: [RFC 1122, obsoletes, RFC 0950]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 0950 Context triple: [RFC 1122, obsoletes, RFC 0950]
-
A.
RFC 950
chosen
RFC 950 is an Internet standard that defines the procedures and format for subnetting IP networks, extending the original IPv4 addressing scheme.
-
B.
RFC 951
RFC 951 is the Internet standard document that specifies the Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) used for automatic IP address assignment and basic network configuration of diskless or minimally configured hosts.
-
C.
RFC 974
RFC 974 is an early Internet standard that defined the original mechanisms for mail routing and the use of MX records in the Domain Name System (DNS).
-
D.
RFC 1195
RFC 1195 is the IETF standard that extends the IS-IS routing protocol to support multiple network layer protocols, including IP.
-
E.
RFC 1350
RFC 1350 is the Internet standards document that defines the Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP), a simple protocol for transferring files over a network.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857bb4c88190a4cf27893fcabed8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada1e70b9081908c801d084a6ae992 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b1f89847e48190b82849701e119758 |
completed | March 11, 2026, 11:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.