Triple

T30794643
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paraná (city) E784193 entity
Predicate riverCrossingConnectionWith P33399 FINISHED
Object Santa Fe (city, Argentina) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Santa Fe (city, Argentina) | Statement: [Paraná (city), riverCrossingConnectionWith, Santa Fe (city, Argentina)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: riverCrossingConnectionWith
Context triple: [Paraná (city), riverCrossingConnectionWith, Santa Fe (city, Argentina)]
  • A. riverCrossingConnection chosen
    Indicates a connection between two locations that are linked by a route or structure specifically used to cross a river.
  • B. hasRiverCrossingType
    Indicates the type or nature of a river crossing associated with an entity (e.g., bridge, ford, ferry).
  • C. riverCrossingFunction
    Indicates a functional relationship where something or someone is transported or moved from one side of a river to the other.
  • D. crossedByRiver
    Indicates that a river passes across or through a specified area, feature, or route.
  • E. hasRiverCrossingNearby
    Indicates that there is a river crossing located in close proximity to the referenced entity or location.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224b2e2a48190b19aa43db9da5b67 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6db1f3ec48190a82e7d893d3c76ba completed May 3, 2026, 5:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6d82adfa481908a5e196d2e18c73f completed May 3, 2026, 5:07 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:42 p.m.