Triple
T30756002
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NDR-113 |
E783086
|
entity |
| Predicate | demonstratesAbility |
P87705
|
FINISHED |
| Object | artistic creativity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: artistic creativity | Statement: [NDR-113, demonstratesAbility, artistic creativity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: demonstratesAbility Context triple: [NDR-113, demonstratesAbility, artistic creativity]
-
A.
demonstratedCapability
chosen
Indicates that an entity has shown, through evidence or performance, the ability to carry out a specific action or function.
-
B.
believedToHaveAbility
Indicates that one entity is thought or assumed to possess a particular capability or power, without asserting that the ability is actually verified.
-
C.
isCapableOf
Indicates that an entity has the ability or capacity to perform a particular action or function.
-
D.
hasCompetence
Indicates that an entity possesses the ability, skill, or qualification to perform a specific task or function effectively.
-
E.
evaluatesAbility
Indicates that one entity assesses or judges the capability, skill, or competence of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224af8d8481908bea03890c5618be |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68f95b4f48190b1dcd818f4fdee15 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f686140aa08190a35f62572b2db9b6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:39 p.m.