Triple
T30740649
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Capability Review |
E782681
|
entity |
| Predicate | evaluatesAgainst |
P150895
|
FINISHED |
| Object | agreed NATO capability targets |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: agreed NATO capability targets | Statement: [Capability Review, evaluatesAgainst, agreed NATO capability targets]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: evaluatesAgainst Context triple: [Capability Review, evaluatesAgainst, agreed NATO capability targets]
-
A.
evaluatesAs
Indicates that one entity is judged, interpreted, or assessed as having a particular value, role, or classification in relation to another.
-
B.
evaluatesComplianceWith
Indicates that one entity assesses whether another entity or its behavior meets specified rules, standards, or requirements.
-
C.
supportsEvaluation
Indicates that one entity provides the necessary functionality, resources, or conditions for another entity to be assessed, tested, or evaluated.
-
D.
canBeReviewedAgainst
chosen
Indicates that one item may be evaluated, compared, or assessed in relation to another as a reference or standard.
-
E.
evaluationBasis
Indicates the criteria, standards, or reference framework used to judge, assess, or measure something in an evaluation process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224aeb1588190897d395e8ed2acb8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68f67eec48190a386d1cdb9222d27 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f686140aa08190a35f62572b2db9b6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:37 p.m.