Triple

T30726749
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject UWB E782296 entity
Predicate hasAdvantageOverBluetoothLowEnergy P186469 FINISHED
Object higher ranging accuracy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher ranging accuracy | Statement: [UWB, hasAdvantageOverBluetoothLowEnergy, higher ranging accuracy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdvantageOverBluetoothLowEnergy
Context triple: [UWB, hasAdvantageOverBluetoothLowEnergy, higher ranging accuracy]
  • A. hasBluetooth
    Indicates that one entity is equipped with or supports Bluetooth connectivity.
  • B. supportsBluetoothCodec
    Indicates that one entity is capable of using or is compatible with a specified Bluetooth audio codec in its operation or communication.
  • C. hasCharacteristic
    Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is defined by a particular attribute, feature, or quality.
  • D. eraCharacteristic
    Indicates that a particular quality, feature, or attribute is characteristic of, or typically associated with, a given historical or temporal era.
  • E. canBondWith
    Indicates that one entity has the capability or compatibility to form a bond or connection with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224ad9f9c81908e02a79ae0001137 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f9fe1a1ca4819084c196f0041f0be2 completed May 5, 2026, 2:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7cf769338819092a5f42653dcc956 completed May 3, 2026, 10:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f9fd66eed48190bdc26a8def328c2d completed May 5, 2026, 2:23 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:37 p.m.