Triple
T306776
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Regional Internet Registries |
E6320
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesPolicyModel |
P11330
|
FINISHED |
| Object | bottom-up policy development |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: bottom-up policy development | Statement: [Regional Internet Registries, usesPolicyModel, bottom-up policy development]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesPolicyModel Context triple: [Regional Internet Registries, usesPolicyModel, bottom-up policy development]
-
A.
supportsPolicy
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
-
B.
implementedPolicy
Indicates that a particular policy has been put into effect or carried out by an entity.
-
C.
governingPolicy
Indicates that one entity serves as the authoritative policy or set of rules that directs, constrains, or regulates the behavior, operation, or decisions of another entity.
-
D.
declaredPolicy
Indicates that an entity has formally stated or announced a specific policy or course of action.
-
E.
usesPrinciple
Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79230508190b912ecb555aae17e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea313be88190b4441f3ea41a99e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e93f38308190b4b480c951f1a1c3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea2af1388190b93235602ace679e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.