Triple
T30657010
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nidal Ayyad |
E780411
|
entity |
| Predicate | penaltyJurisdiction |
P71039
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States federal government |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States federal government | Statement: [Nidal Ayyad, penaltyJurisdiction, United States federal government]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: penaltyJurisdiction Context triple: [Nidal Ayyad, penaltyJurisdiction, United States federal government]
-
A.
awardingJurisdiction
Indicates the authority or legal power granted to an entity to make decisions, judgments, or awards in a particular domain or case.
-
B.
jurisdictionOfProsecution
Indicates the legal authority or territory within which a prosecution is carried out or has the power to proceed.
-
C.
deathPenaltyJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates that a given jurisdiction legally authorizes, applies, or recognizes the death penalty as a form of criminal punishment.
-
D.
intendedJurisdiction
Indicates the legal or geographic area over which something (such as a law, policy, or authority) is meant to have power or apply.
-
E.
pardonJurisdiction
Indicates the authority or legal power an entity has to grant pardons for offenses within a particular scope or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224a6d10481909290be1a00fc83b3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68ade49d48190a80182cf054bd154 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6861170d08190bb98be609d436f84 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:30 p.m.